MCS in “Deep Financial Trouble?” Elmore Gone? School Going AMI?

"Just wondering if you knew that MCS is in deep financial trouble and has fired Jan Elmore without just cause.

Apparently the program is becoming AMI and all others are being slowly replaced."

The above quote is the entire contents of a letter that someone went to great trouble to anonymously snail mail to us with no signature or return address. Whether any of it is true or not, we don't know. Make of it what you will.

But it did pique our curiosity enough to cause us to compare the school's recent IRS Form 990s for information about its financial situation. The 990 is the publicly available tax return and financial statement that all nonprofits must file.

As of this writing, the most recent 990 is for the school's fiscal year (FY) ending June 30, 2007. Comparing this financial statement with the 990s of the years ending June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005 reveals that even in that last "good" economic year before the recession hit later in 2007, MCS's financial position had deteriorated. Consider that:

• In the FY ending June 30, 2007, MCS generated program income and contributions of $1,474,679 compared to the prior FY income and contributions of $1,526,880, a reduction in income of $52,201.
• At the same time, program services (expense of operating the school) increased $199,295 to $1,525,048 from the prior FY's $1,325,753.
• In the FY ending June 30, 1007, MCS lost $50,369 compared to the prior year's gain of $201,127.
• Accounts receivable in the FY ending June 30, 2007 were $405,515, up from $130,730 in the prior FY and $44,796 in the FY ending June 30, 2005.
• Contributions in the FY ending June 30, 2007 totaled $25,049, of which $10,350 were cash donations. In the prior FY, contributions totaled $116,772, of which all but $720 were cash donations.
• Salaries in the FY ending June 30, 2007, not including that of the Head of School, totaled $865,423, up from $710,502 in the prior FY.
• The salary of Head of School Wendy Fisher increased to $70,386 from $64,770 in the prior FY. In the FY ending June 30, 2005, the prior Head of School earned less than $50,000.

Other items of note in the 2007 Form 990:

• On April 18, 2007, the MCS Board of Trustees voted to revise the school's bylaws, reducing the minimum number of Trustees on the Board to eight. Ten weeks later, on June 30, 2007, the school's Board had just six Trustees.
• In contrast to the open meetings required under the old MCS bylaws, the new bylaws state that meetings of the MCS Board of Trustees "shall be closed, except when the Board votes to hold an open meeting."
• In the Form 990, the IRS requires that a nonprofit list the names and addresses of all trustees who served during the FY. MCS did not, however, name in the 990 for the FY ending June 30, 2007 at least two Trustees (the Vice-Chairman and the Treasurer) who served on the Board during that FY and then left well before their terms ended.

We'll review and report on the MCS financial situation again when the IRS Form 990 for the year ended June 30, 2008 becomes available. Posted April 2, 2009

"Misstatements"? Or More?

In a June 16, 2005 letter written by Wendy Fisher, the MCS Head of School, to the parents and students in that year's Upper Elementary class, she described the new teacher for the UE as follows: "[Teacher's Name] has 20 years of experience teaching children from kindergarten through high school. She has also taught at the university level and will complete her Upper Elementary Montessori certificate this summer." These qualifications turned out to be false or highly exaggerated:

• The new teacher had no prior teaching or classroom experience from kindergarten through high school, other than homeschooling her own children.
• The new teacher had no teaching experience at the university level, other than as a graduate Teaching Assistant.
• The new teacher did not complete her Upper Elementary Montessori Certificate over the summer, and would not complete if for another year. In fact, on the date the letter was written, she had not yet begun her Montessori training.

After the discrepancies between the facts and her claims had been made public, and weeks after they had been brought to her attention, Wendy finally wrote to the UE parents and students and admitted her “misstatement” and that she regretted her “miscommunication.” But, as detailed in the post below, "School Leadership Should "Model the Ideals We Espouse to Our Children." many believed Wendy's "misstatement" and "miscommunication" actually, albeit unintentionally, revealed more about Wendy than it did about the teacher she purported to describe.

We recall all this because we recently saw an article Wendy wrote in 2007 for a magazine published by the Charlottesville Regional Chamber of Commerce. There, she made a couple of curious new statements. The first was that the "Montessori Community School on Pantops Mountain … has served students from the toddler years through 8th grade for more than 25 years." But, as can be found on the School's own website and in its Parent Handbook:

• While the school was founded 25 years prior to her writing the article, for over ten years it served only elementary school children.
• The first Primary class serving ages 3-6 was not added until after the School moved to its present location in 1993.
• The Middle School (grades 7-8) was added in 2002.
• The Toddler program was added in 2004.

Thus, the claim that MCS "has served students from the toddler years through 8th grade for more than 25 years" is far off the mark. So, is this just an innocent example of horribly sloppy writing that a middle school teacher would mark in red for correction? Or is it evidence of something more?

Before we answer, let's consider her second curious statement in the article. Wendy goes on to write:

Visitors to MCS often ask, "Where do all those perfect children come from?"

Sure they do. First, let's agree that it is not credible that "(V)isitors (plural) to MCS often ask" the very same exact question about "perfect children." That's not to disparage the kids at MCS, who are great. Perhaps visitors ask about nice, or well-behaved, or curious, or wonderful children. But, really, for a writer to quote multiple visitors to MCS often asking "where do all those perfect children come from?" is absurd.

Now, consider Wendy's use of the phrase "perfect children" that she claims multiple visitors to MCS often use to describe the children at MCS, the school she happens to lead. Since it's a rare school that turns out "perfect children" (are there any?), that must make MCS, and its Head of School, pretty darn close to perfect, too.

Still more sloppy writing? "Misstatement?" "Miscommunication?" Or something more?

Making up this quote, attributing it to multiple visitors, choosing to say that "perfect children" are produced by MCS -- that goes beyond sloppy writing. Once again, Wendy's Chamber of Commerce article unintentionally succeeds in revealing far more about its author than it does about the "visitors" and "perfect children" and school that she purports to describe.

MCS Business Manager Convicted of Felony

On November 8, 2007, Rebecca "Becky" Dowdell, the Business Manager of the Montessori Community School of Charlottesville on Pantops Mountain, pleaded guilty to conspiring to commit wire fraud, a felony, according to this news release from United States Attorney John L. Brownlee posted on the Richmond FBI's website. The conviction was unrelated to her work at the school.

On March 26, 2008, Ms. Dowdell was sentenced in federal court in Charlottesville to six months of house arrest and three years of probation, according to the Daily Progress. She faced a maximum sentence of five years and a $250,000 fine, according to an earlier news release from the U.S. Department of Justice issued at the time of her indictment.

The website of Roy M. Terry, Jr. and the law firm of DurretteBradshaw PLC. which has been appointed Receiver in the case of the Securities and Exchange Commission v. Terry L. Dowdell, et al. (including Rebecca Dowdell as "relief defendant"), currently pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, Charlottesville Division (Civil Action No. 3:01CV00116) is here and contains court documents and information related to the civil case.

We're informed that following her felony conviction, Becky has remained as the MCS Business Manager, and she is named on the school's website as its Business Manager, as of April 18, 2008.

Members of the MCS community have expressed concerns to this website over the safety of the school's funds and their private financial information. Unfortunately, we are unable to provide any information on this situation other than the facts and sources cited above. As of April 18, 2008.

The More Things (Teachers, Parents, Students, Etc.) Change...

(updated September 2007)

Posted August 17, 2007

We withdrew our child after one year, although he was flourishing academically we were concerned with his overall safety. Hopefully the playground monitoring has also improved since we left.
Submitted by Former parent, a parent

Posted August 9, 2007

Too many children in the classrooms and too little meaningful communication between administration and staff. A few earnest teachers do exist in this community, but they cannot overcome the packed classrooms and 'insiders' mentality of the administration. All the power currently exists within the hands of a few mothers/administrators who will quickly judge new families as either 'with' them or 'against' them and mentally dismiss those who point out any flaws. If you are interested in something more than a place to warehouse your child/ren during the day and have the resources to make a better choice, look elsewhere.
Submitted by a parent

Above are two recent Parent Reviews posted to GreatSchools.net about the Montessori Community School at Pantops Mountain in Charlottesville. Two years ago, parents first publicly expressed concern about these issues -- and more -- to the new MCS leadership, and were dismissed, and then left the school. Remarkably, now two years later, after unprecedented family and staff turnover, other families at the school are still raising the same issues, and still so moved to bring them to the attention of the community that they are posting them on the Internet. To be fair, there are also a few positive reviews on GreatSchools -- which appear to be posted by MCS board members. It's unfortunate that some Board members appear to believe that their duty as trustees of a nonprofit that is "owned" not by them, but by the greater community, is to ignore or dismiss these issues, as the latter post above and the earlier one below suggest. It's a shame they don't understand that their duty is to act independently on behalf of the wider community to address these issues and better the school. BTW, if you want to see how damning all these negative reviews are, visit GreatSchools.net and see how many other one and two star ratings you find. Technorati Tags: montessori charlottesville

"I Used to Be a Supporter" of MCS...

(May 2007)
"I used to be a supporter, and we even stuck with the school through the 'political' fallout. Now, I realize we were wrong. We will never go back. Save yourself a heartache and look elsewhere, for your child's sake."

Above is a Parent Review recently posted to GreatSchools.net about the Montessori Community School at Pantops Mountain in Charlottesville. This Webby Award-winning website ranks all public and private schools in the nation, based on objective criteria and parent ratings. Based on all parent reviews on GreatSchools.net, MCS receives an Overall Rating of 2 Stars (5 stars is highest), the lowest among public and private elementary schools in the Charlottesville area. Technorati Tags: montessori charlottesville

The Story of this Website

UPDATED MAY 2007. In early 2006, current and recently-departed families at the Montessori Community School of Charlottesville on Pantops Mountain, many of whom did not know one another, found they had something in common. They shared a strong support of -- and devotion to -- the School, and were extremely concerned about the School's new direction and leadership. They identified several critical issues, including overcrowded and understaffed classrooms, false and misleading School communications, unsafe School environments, violation of School Bylaws, a new, intimidating Community atmosphere that was hostile to parent concerns, and others. These extremely serious problems and more had been brought to the attention of the Head of School and the Board of Directors by these families, some of whom had been at the School for years and volunteered years of service on the Board and in other positions. Not only was nothing done by the School Leadership to address these problems, but in some instances, they were not even viewed as problems. Clearly, the School had gone far down the wrong track. So these families came together to consider other ways to bring these serious issues to the attention of the School Community. In February 2006, they circulated an An Open Letter to the Montessori Community School Community -- Why We're Leaving MCS, linked here, that described these problems, and then set up this website to document in detail the problems expressed in the Open Letter. They then circulated a second letter, Ten Reforms to Restore Parent Confidence at MCS, linked here. These reforms are constructive, common-sense, un-controversial, can be quickly adopted in most cases, and would provide significant and immediate improvements to the School.

On March 9, 2006, The Hook, a weekly newspaper in Charlottesville, published a cover story about the problems at the Montessori Community School of Charlottesville under the title Schoolhouse Rocked: Debate Rumbles on Montessori's Mountain, which is linked here, and here. The Concerned Parents did not solicit this article, and with perhaps one exception, did not cooperate with the reporter who wrote it. In contrast, the School Leadership rolled out the red carpet for the reporter, with the Board Chair and the Head of School sitting for long interviews and setting up photo shoots at the school.

The article turned out to be devastating to the School in the eyes of the Charlottesville community. Here, in the School Leadership's own words, were documented the very problems the Concerned Parents had raised: the endorsement of up to 45 children in one class with one teacher and no aide; an admission that the Head of School materially misstated a teacher's credentials to parents; and the School's judgment that despite two different families discovering their young children unsupervised on the playground (one was a 4 year old found with the playground gate open!), there was no problem with safety at the School. "We've never had a child go missing," the Head of School was quoted as saying. Leaders of other Montessori schools in Charlottesville suddenly fielded numerous calls from their own families, and correctly reassured them that the serious issues raised in The Hook article were not a reflection on the Montessori method itself, but were specific to the new leadership and policies at the Montessori Community School of Charlottesville on Pantops. Indeed, several of the primary-level children who were pulled out of MCS during this school year now attend other Montessori schools in Charlottesville.

The School Leadership tries to reassure parents that all is well with the School. To this end, it has added an FAQ section to the School website to answer parent questions. But of the three FAQs on the website, which is linked here, one of the School's answers is simply false (see History of "No Child Left Behind" Policy post below). A second tries to answer a question about the School's finances, yet fails to mention that the School has a debt of over a million dollars, an omission of a material fact that makes its answer that the School's finances are "excellent" so incomplete as to be deceptive. These "answers" to parents' FAQs are yet more examples of the kind of communications that cause so many to view the School Leadership as "credibility challenged." [UPDATED 6/19/06: Perhaps the challenge of giving credible answers to parents' Frequently Asked Questions proved too much for MCS. Without explanation, the School has eliminated access to the FAQ section from within its own website. However, you can still find the deceptive FAQ page here.]

As the Concerned Parents said in the Open Letter, the reason we raised our concerns publicly is that we strongly support Montessori education and care deeply about the future of the Montessori Community School of Charlottesville on Pantops. We want families in Charlottesville to have the same opportunity we once had to experience a quality Montessori education in a nurturing, community environment. As the School Community and the greater Charlottesville Community become aware of the serious challenges facing the School, we hope an ongoing process of open debate and meaningful reform will ultimately lead to a better School and a healthier School Community. It is in that spirit that we put forth these materials on this website and continue to update them. Technorati Tags: montessori charlottesville

One Year After Mass Exodus, Turmoil Continues at MCS

SPRING 2007. The Vice Chairman and Treasurer of the Board of the Montessori Pantops Mountain Community School recently resigned simultaneously, after serving just seven months out of their 24 month terms. In November, after just a few weeks of school, Head of School Wendy Fisher summarily fired an experienced, certified, and well-liked Montessori primary guide who she had just hired, based on a self-interested "consultant's" report -- and then, ahem, hired the "consultant" as a replacement. And, we hear, the Parent Exodus from MCS continues; many families will not return next fall for the 2007-2008 school year.

During and after the 2005-2006 school year, in an unprecedented mass exodus from MCS, numerous families who were dissatisfied with the leadership and educational experience at MCS either withdrew their children or refused to reenroll them for the current school year. Some of these families were members of the "Concerned Parents" who created this website to highlight problems at the school that the leadership refused to address. But many others who left MCS were not affiliated with the Concerned Parents, and included Board members and other families with a long history at the school.

The leadership of MCS proclaimed to those families who stayed or started at MCS, that with all those "noisy" families gone, the turmoil at MCS was over. The facts prove otherwise, and that the problem is not families no longer at the school, but the leadership that is still there. Consider that last spring, after the exodus of Board members from the school, and the resignation of other Board members who felt they were not being allowed to fulfill their ethical responsibility to independently and objectively review the performance of the Head of School, just three Board members remained out of the minimum of ten required by the bylaws. To fill those seats, the Head of School and her supporters packed the Board with the Head of School's most reliable supporters. Yet now, two of those supporters - the two who were considered so reliable that they were installed as Board officers even though they had no prior experience on the MCS Board, including one who led MCS fundraising efforts and was a major contributor -- resigned after serving barely a quarter of their terms.

As for the fired primary guide, you wouldn't wish on your worst enemy the railroading she got from this leadership. After just a few weeks of school, the Head of School brought into this well-liked, experienced, and Montessori-certified teacher's classroom, an alleged "consultant." This "consultant," who now wanted a primary teaching job, and who the Head of School had previously tried to hire, was - surprise, surprise - critical of this teacher's performance. The Head of School then used that "consultant's" report to fire the teacher "for cause." Guess who replaced the fired teacher? Why, the "consultant," of course. And were the parents of the children in that class informed about what caused the teacher to be fired? No.

And what happened to the former MCS teacher? It turns out that other local schools' opinions of the MCS leadership are uniformly unfavorable, as families enrolling at these schools after leaving MCS recount their experiences. Thus, this teacher's bad treatment is just one more unfortunate MCS horror story; more a reflection on the MCS leadership's problems than on the teacher herself. She is teaching elsewhere in the Charlottesville area.

So, what happened in the past two years at MCS? The answer, perhaps, lies in George Orwell's Animal Farm. Like the new MCS leadership, the animals' goal was to create a perfect peaceful sanctuary. Unfortunately, highly imperfect leaders seized power. The result was that Animal Farm became one of literature's great cautionary tales of what happens when the good end is repeatedly invoked to justify any and all means to achieve it, such as lying, intimidation, personal destruction, expulsion from the community, etc.

MCS Head of School Wendy Fisher recently was quoted in the press as saying: "It's a leap of faith for parents to enroll their child." Read the posts below to see why so many agree, and have chosen not to re-enroll.

Technorati Tags: montessori charlottesville

A Fabulous School Year

Well, it’s been a fabulous school year. Our child is flourishing academically as well as personally and has come to feel competent, confident, and excited about learning… Everything we had hoped and expected to find at the Charlottesville Pantops Montessori Community School — but didn’t. No. We had to go elsewhere to find all that (and more). We still believe strongly in the Montessori method and values, when they are well-executed. So we hated to leave. But when we see the transformation in our child, how could we be anything but utterly grateful that we did? We never knew what we were missing.

We’ve found that our story is not unique. Rather, it's the norm. Others who also left the Pantops Montessori Community School report their children are thriving at their new schools and excited about learning. Unfortunately, though, many students who left MCS ended up having to do remedial work with tutors, or attend summer school before they could be placed at grade level in a new school. Others had to repeat an entire grade. And some MCS students were altogether refused admittance to other private schools in the area. What a shame.

…And an interesting endnote: Some of last year's most vocal supporters of the new MCS have this year removed their children from MCS and placed them in different schools. Is this a case of "watch what I do, not what I say"? Do actions speak louder than words?

Still Concerned MCS Parent Name Withheld No. 6

"Faith-Based Montessori Play" Replaces Academics

From Catherine Leslie, former Board Chair and Treasurer of the Montessori Community School of Charlottesville at Pantops:

I have a few comments to post. I think Barret Stump's letter is excellent, heartfelt and astutely true. I had three children at MCS from 1995 until this past spring. Two were there throughout their elementary and middle school years. I served on the Board during most of their time there, as a Board member, Chair of the Board and Treasurer. I left the school because it wasn't teaching my youngest child fundamental academics and I felt I had become the Board 'crank,' bringing up concerns but finding no ear. Clearly the concerns of the school's constituents, Board members or not, are being ignored. More will just have to vote with their feet. Given what has happened of late, I feel inclined to say some things, but, quite frankly, feel I have already mourned the loss of what was once a wonderful school in this community, so I think I will make a few, brief comments. I suspect much will come out in these pages.

• The curriculum and accountability were once excellent. The teachers (particularly the Roells) knew what a child needed to learn at each grade level and ensured that it happened while following the child within a Montessori framework. By the time my youngest was in the LE classrooms, however, inexperienced and dogmatic teachers failed to teach a fraction of the content my older children were exposed to. Quite frankly, I would call it "faith-based Montessori play."

• I tried to keep an open mind about the new direction the school was going, but decided that my youngest daughter would leave MCS when I was not able to convince the Board to use the words 'academic' or 'knowledge' in the mission statement. As I pointed out then, even Covenant's mission is, "Academic excellence under the sovereignty of God." They get what should come first at a school. One example of the state of things was when I had to question why the Board was going to vote to endorse Wendy Fisher's plan for changes in the middle school without even hearing about the changes!

• It appears that over the past eight months, the Board has allowed the administration of the school to spend funds and hire with rampant cronyism, without competitive bidding or legitimate hiring practices. Board Bylaws have not been followed, possibly threatening the legitimacy of its tax-exempt corporation status.

  Technorati Tags: montessori charlottesville

School Leadership Should "Model the Ideals We Espouse to Our Children"

I've been asked more than once now: "Jon, what the heck are you so fired up about?"

Indulge me for the time it takes to read this post. A few minutes tops, and that's only if you read all the linked materials. But the reason I highlight this particular episode, among several I could cite, is because it's objective and well documented. And, to me at least, it's very revealing.

We start on June 16, 2005, when Wendy Fisher, the highest ranking staffer at the Montessori Community School of Charlottesville at Pantops, wrote a letter, linked here, to all the parents and students in this year's Upper Elementary, including my family, that described the new hire for the UE and what the class would look like. In that letter, she wrote: "Patricia Machat has 20 years of experience teaching children from kindergarten through high school. She has also taught at the university level and will complete her Upper Elementary Montessori certificate this summer."

The truth turned out to be this:

1. Patricia had no prior teaching experience, other than homeschooling.
2. Patricia had no teaching experience at the university level, other than as a TA.
3. Patricia did not complete her Upper Elementary Montessori Certificate over the summer, and is not now Montessori certified. In fact, Patricia didn't commence her Montessori training until June 19, 2005, three days after Wendy's letter was written. It takes one year, minimum, to finish Montessori training under either AMS or AMI. Only after successfully completing this training does either society award a Montessori certificate.

Now, this troubled me. Wendy had Patricia's resume and had interviewed her, and no one has ever suggested that Patricia misled Wendy, because if you ask Patricia about her background, she's very up front about it. So why would Wendy's letter take such liberty with the facts? Items 1 and 2 exaggerated the truth beyond recognition. And item 3 was out and out false.

What then troubled me even more was Wendy's reaction to my requests for clarification of these points. She would not confirm any of the above, even though it turned out to be easily documented. Finally, the Board Chair wrote to her, posing one question: Is Patricia Montessori certified? Wendy's reply, link here, took up a full page of 7 paragraphs - and still evaded answering that simple yes or no question. On September 10, I informed the Board officers of the huge discrepancy between what Wendy Fisher had written about Patricia's qualifications to parents and the actual facts. In her response on that same day, Wendy finally admitted that her prior statements that Patricia was Montessori certified and had "completed training" (something Wendy said in several emails exchanged at this time) were, to use her phrase, "miscommunication."

Given that Wendy had an obligation both to do due diligence on Patricia's qualifications and to also communicate forthrightly with parents, this "miscommunication" was troubling enough. Giving Wendy every possible benefit of the doubt, she failed in both obligations. But it got worse. Here's what troubled me still more: On September 15, Wendy wrote a letter, link here, to Upper El parents and students addressing the growing concerns about that class. In that letter, she chose not to divulge to parents what she had just five days earlier admitted privately to the Board's officers; that she made these material "miscommunications" to these very same parents. Given this perfect opportunity to admit and correct her prior misstatements to these very same parents, I found her failure to do so very disturbing. Because to me, this was a clear test of character and leadership. We want leaders who, if they tell you something that they later learn was wrong, will admit it, correct it, and apologize. Isn't that what we'd all want our kids to do in that situation? Instead, Wendy chose to not reveal the truth to the parents she had, to put it most charitably, misinformed.

On September 26, I reviewed this sequence of events at a Board meeting, so it was all now public. And with it now public, Wendy had no choice but to address it. On the next day, September 27, Wendy wrote to the UE parents and students, link here, and admitted her "misstatement" on Patricia's training and certification. She attributed it to her confusion between AMI and AMS certification procedures. But recall that it takes a year, minimum, to achieve certification from either society, and Patricia didn't start her Montessori training until June 19, 2005. To me, Wendy's explanation was not credible. And that's not my opinion alone, but also the opinion of nationally known Montessori leaders with whom I reviewed it. One called it such a "serious breach of ethics that the Board should demand her resignation." (Instead, the MCS Board quashed the search it promised to the Community for a new Head of School and hurriedly promoted Wendy to the position. See Why Did the Board Cancel the Search for the Head of School? post below).

Those who defended this behavior said it was a result of Wendy having a "communications problem." To address this "problem," the MCS Board even established a committee to review her communications. But when we communicate, we make choices about how and what to communicate, and what NOT to communicate. We make those choices based on our character. To me, Wendy's choices about what -- and what not -- to tell parents demonstrate not a "communications problem," but a character problem.

Someone shared with me a recent edition of the Montessori Community News in which Wendy wrote, "I hope that we model the ideals we espouse to the children."

Then isn't it fair to ask if the conduct described above satisfies that standard? Does it "model the ideals we espouse to our children?"

I think most of us would agree that the answer is No. And that's why Jon has been so fired up. And this was just one example where the school leadership failed to model the ideals we espouse to our children. As you read the other posts on this website, you'll see there are so many others. By Jon Rintels, former Board Chair. Technorati Tags: montessori charlottesville

Parent Satisfaction Survey

A Montessori Community School at Pantops, Charlottesville, parent asks: "Last spring, MCS asked parents to fill out a 'Parent Satisfaction Survey' and promised to post the results online. I did not reenroll my child at MCS. But I'm curious whether other parents were as dissatisfied as me. I can't find the survey results on the school website. Do you know what happened to the survey and what the results were?"

Some background: In May of 2006, Wendy Fisher, MCS Head of School, wrote to parents:

Montessori Community School values continual learning and improvement. Parent feedback and input is [sic] an important part of that process and as such, MCS is asking that you take 15-20 minutes to complete the online Montessori Community School Parent Satisfaction Survey… MCS will post the findings online and will email all parents a link to the report. MCS also will share the results in the introductory newsletter in September. (Her entire letter is here.)

But six months later, the survey results have not been posted on the MCS website. Nor, as far as we can tell, were the results ever shared in a school newsletter. Instead, the report was sent to parents as an email attachment, with minimal discussion of its results.

Why the change from the clear procedure set out in May for publicly disseminating, discussing, and acting upon the survey results? Well, you don't have to be Columbo to solve this case. It turns out the results reflected far more parent dissatisfaction with MCS than the leadership ever expected. While parents generally were satisfied with the guides, we're told, the marks given to the leadership of the school were abysmal.

The school website posts results of parent surveys about foreign language instruction, here, and about "why their child does not have an answer to the burning question 'What did you do at school today?'" here.

But rather than publish the Parent Satisfaction Survey, as it explicitly promised it would, the leadership sent the survey results out in a manner calculated to draw as little attention as possible.

Which may shed light on why parents showed such dissatisfaction in the survey with the leadership. Technorati Tags: montessori charlottesville

It's the End of the School Year. Do You Know Where Your Board Is?

Why have so many Board member-parents resigned from the Board and chosen to remove their children from the Montessori Community School of Charlottesville at Pantops?

Of the ten MCS parents who constituted the Board of Directors at the start of the Board term in June 2005, just two remain on the Board for the new Board term starting June 2006. At least five of those ten '05-'06 Board member/parents, and perhaps more, withdrew one or all of their children from MCS before or during the '05-'06 school year, or will not reenroll them for the '06-'07 school year. Of the three parents who volunteered to become new Board members early in the '05-'06 year, all three resigned from the Board last month prior to the expiration of their terms. The Faculty Representative to the Board at the start of the '05-'06 Board Year, Beth Van Wassenhove, has also chosen to leave the School. All these good people were once among the school's strongest supporters, and are also the people most familiar with the school's new leadership. Now, they're gone. With the School making no comment about this unprecedented Board turnover and exodus, no wonder parents continue to be concerned. Technorati Tags: montessori charlottesville

History of "No Child Left Behind" Policy at Montessori Community School of Charlottesville

The Hook's March 9, 2006 cover story on the Montessori Community School on Pantops, link here, and here, reports that Wendy Fisher states the highly unpopular, punitive, and vindictive MCS "No Child Left Behind" Policy has "always existed, though she agrees that the school may not have enforced it in the past." This policy says, per the FAQ section of the School website, "siblings of students who do not complete the three-year cycle were not offered enrollment," link here. The FAQ section also claims this policy has existed "informally" at MCS "in past years."

This is simply not true. Last year's policy was QUITE different and very narrowly confined to one particular situation in the primary class. In the primary class - and the primary class ONLY -- the staff was frustrated that some families sent a child to MCS as a 3 year old only to have that child leave after two years to enroll in a public school kindergarten. Therefore, in the year 2004-2005, MCS implemented a policy to not enroll new younger siblings in the primary class from a family that had withdrawn an older child from primary prior to kindergarten. It never applied to any other level. And it certainly never applied, as the School has this year sought to apply it, to deny reenrollment to a sibling already enrolled in the school. Such a harsh and punitive policy would be completely contrary to the Montessori First Principle of "Follow the Child," as well as be completely antithetical to the idea that a child should finish each three year cycle that this policy was supposed to promote at the primary level. Really, could there be anything less "Montessori" than punishing one sibling by kicking him out of MCS because MCS turned out to be not the best environment for another sibling?

If it's true that this year's greatly expanded policy was in effect last year, then why has it never appeared in the Parent Handbook prior to this year, Wendy Fisher's first as the top staffer at the school, when she rewrote the Parent Handbook? Isn't it odd that such a critical policy for parents and the school, one that the School now claims has always applied to all classes at the school, would not receive one single mention in prior years' Parent Handbooks? That it would never receive one single mention in any prior year's tuition contract or enrollment materials? That instead, per Wendy Fisher and the MCS website, it was applied "informally?" Isn't that strange for a policy that had the potential to critically impact every single family with more than one child at MCS? The School's assertion on this is just not credible, and that is backed up by Board Members with years of service at MCS.

If it's true that this policy was in effect last year, then why didn't it apply last year to Board members' families, as well as other families? Did they get preferential treatment? Many people have asked this and they deserve an answer. The answer is the policy didn't apply to them. Why? Because their kids were not in the primary class.

The truth is the "No Child Left Behind" Policy, other than in the very narrowly tailored circumstance described above, has never been the policy at MCS in prior years, even "informally." Rather, Wendy Fisher imposed this far broader punitive policy this year, without Board approval (see Where Was the Board? An Ex-Board Member Speaks post below). But rather than take ownership of her unpopular policy, and defend her efforts to use it to deny reenrollment to siblings already at the School (see Yet Another Committed Family Forced to Leave Montessori Community School of Charlottesville post below), she repeatedly claims she is merely implementing a policy that was in effect "informally" in prior years before she became top staffer, trying to pass the buck and the blame, and deflect criticism away from her for what is entirely her creation and responsibility.

This is a clear example of not just bad new policy at the School, but also the quality of leadership and lack of credibility that so concerns not just the Concerned Parents, but the wider Montessori and Charlottesville communities. Technorati Tags: montessori charlottesville

UPDATED 6/19/06: Perhaps the challenge of giving credible answers to parents' Frequently Asked Questions proved too much for MCS. Without explanation, the School has eliminated access to the FAQ section from within its own website. However, you can still find the FAQ page here.

Why Did the Board Cancel the Search for a Head of School?

When the prior Head of School left, the Board of the Montessori Community School of Charlottesville at Pantops promised to conduct a thorough search for a new HOS and appointed a committee to design that search process. But then in late September, Wendy Fisher was compelled to admit that she had misstated the qualifications of the new Upper Elementary teacher. A few days later, at a hastily convened Parents Meeting for Upper Elementary, she was roundly criticized by the parents of more than half the students for her design of that class, which embodied her vision of “authentic Montessori,” yet turned out to be what many consider the worst and most dysfunctional classroom in the history of MCS. When Ms. Fisher flatly refused to make any improvements to the class, and refused to even engage in a constructive dialogue with parents, crisis ensued.

The Board leadership strongly supported Wendy, and thus was in a dilemma. Since Wendy was a candidate for Head of School, the growing community concerns about her performance would become critical issues in the search process, and require thorough investigation. But when the Board suddenly quashed the Head of School search it had promised to the Community and bestowed the Head of School position on Ms. Fisher, voila -- No Debate. No Investigation. Done Deal.

This was completely contrary to the Board’s duties under the bylaws and any concept of good nonprofit governance. It may be an exaggeration to say that the Board's cancellation of the promised HOS search is the nonprofit world's equivalent of an anti-democratic coup d'etat, but not much. In my view, it's certainly a much more plausible explanation for the cancellation of the Head of School search than what Board officers offered at the Community Meeting, "sorry, we were too busy building our house, going to Europe, etc." I think the Board leadership feared that a legitimate search process might not deliver the result it wanted -- giving Wendy the Head of School position. So it halted the process, and instead just handed Wendy the job. Was she the best Head of School candidate available to MCS? Thanks to the Board's actions, we'll never know. But if she was the best, what did the Board leadership have to fear from a real search? By Jon Rintels Technorati Tags: montessori charlottesville

Yet Another Committed Family Forced to Leave Montessori Community School of Charlottesville

Dear MCS Community,

As some of you know, we withdrew our children from MCS a few weeks ago. We have suffered a tremendous amount of hurt and heartache over this experience. Our main concerns have been expressed in detail in letters to the Board of Directors, and echo those of others in this forum. Like others, our concerns about education and safety were ignored rather than addressed. Like others, we have not been treated with honesty, grace, courtesy, or respect. And like others in this community, we were denied the opportunity to re-enroll our children for no reason other than because we voiced our concerns. We were unable to remain at a school with such a hostile climate and culture and chose instead to leave immediately.

We have never been Board members. We have never been involved in the politics at MCS. We had no particular loyalty to the previous leadership. We are average Montessori parents who support the Montessori method in our home, who go on field trips, and who have coached an MCS soccer team now and then. We are private people. We did not want to post our concerns in a public forum.

But over the past few months, we have lost faith in the leadership of the school at all levels. We feel obligated to make the parents of the MCS community aware of yet another family harmed by the current leadership. We want to speak for the many families still at MCS who feel unable to voice concerns for fear of retribution. Our motivation in coming forward is to do the right thing, in the hope that the community that we loved, but were forced to leave, can come together to honestly and openly resolve these problems.

Fortunately, this eye-opening experience has given us the opportunity to transfer our children to other schools and we (and they) are thrilled. We wish to echo the stories of other parents who have found public and other private schools in town to be far superior in academic rigor and training for life (grace and courtesy, open and honest communication) than what we have experienced at MCS over the past year.

Sincerely, Kurt and Lisa Illig

Technorati Tags: montessori charlottesville

Ten Reforms to Restore Parent Confidence at Montessori Community School of Charlottesville

Last week, Concerned Montessori Community School of Charlottesville at Pantops Parents sent to the School Community an "Open Letter," linked here, citing numerous serious issues that caused us to decide, reluctantly, to withdraw our children from MCS. We also launched this Concerned MCS Parents website, where the School Community could find additional information on these issues, as well as personal stories and observations. Today, we sent to the Community a list of Ten Reforms that we believe are constructive, common-sense, un-controversial, can be quickly adopted in most cases, and will provide significant and immediate improvements to the School. We hope they will help guide the School Community as it addresses the issues raised in our Open Letter. They are:

1. The School should add "academics" to the MCS Mission Statement, re-emphasize core academic subjects in the curriculum, and develop specific benchmarks.
2. The School should not overcrowd and understaff classrooms, and should adhere at all times to AMS Standards on Ratios of Students to Lead Teacher and Classroom Staff/Assistants. No more than 30 students per lead teacher in primary, lower elementary, and upper elementary classes; no more than 15 students per full-time classroom staff member in primary, and no more than 20 students per full-time classroom staff member in lower elementary and upper elementary.
3. The School should communicate graciously and honestly with parents, fully and accurately informing them of class size, personnel, curriculum, policies, and other key issues, in full compliance with AMS Standards on "truth in advertising."
4. The School's Board of Directors should adhere to the School's bylaws and implement Good Governance practices. It should allow Directors to fully discuss school issues with staff, parents, and other stakeholders in the MCS Community, in confidence, and without permission or attendance of Board Officers or Head of School.
5. The School's Board of Directors should appoint new Directors to reach its maximum allowed size of 20 Directors, including a significant number of parents that support these reforms as well as non-parent members, and not decrease its minimum number of 10 directors. At least one non-parent member with an expertise in educational evaluation should be appointed.
6. The School's Board of Directors should regularly review the MCS budget and program, and conduct an annual independent and objective review of the performance of the Head of School using confidential evaluations from staff and parents.
7. The School should end its new policy of denying admission to one child in a family if that family chooses to withdraw or not re-enroll another child at MCS.
8. The School should implement "best practice" hiring: for top staff positions, the School should advertise the position and interview multiple qualified candidates; for contracted jobs, open and competitive bidding.
9. The School should achieve AMS accreditation.
10. The School should implement additional reforms to restore parent confidence and a sense of "community" to MCS, and establish a system where parents and staff may bring issues, concerns, and suggestions for improvements to the attention of the School and the Board without fear of intimidation or retribution. To that end, these ten reforms are only a beginning.

Respectfully submitted, Concerned MCS Parents

Read the entire letter describing the Ten Reforms here.
Technorati Tags: montessori charlottesville

Why Can't My Daughter Read?

I found out last week that my daughter, who is more than halfway through 1st grade at MCS, will not be able to transfer to another school due to her extremely low (non-existent) reading level. By one account, she is two grade levels below her grade. This new school would have no teacher or reading group that low. She does not know her sight words or basic blends. We might have to hire a tutor, seek assistance at the McGuffey Reading Center at the Curry School and begin lessons at home. She might need to repeat 1st grade.

I know there has been much concern in the past about the educational rigor of the MCS program. Some parents who have transferred out have expressed their disappointment in the educational program at MCS and the difficulty their children have faced in their new schools.

We were very disappointed when the guide structure changed in the Lower Elementary and Upper Elementary classrooms. We believe there are enough students in each class to warrant two guides in each class at all times. They need assistance, monitoring, accountability and gentle guidance. Younger children especially should not be expected to perform independently and always choose challenging works. If the goal of MCS is to improve the classrooms, then why has there been a decrease in the amount of time the guides are available to the children?

Children should meet basic educational standards at each grade level comparable to other schools, traditional or alternative. Most people choose a private education for their children (and pay a large sum of money) because they believe it to be superior to the education provided by public schools. If a Montessori education does not offer more benefits to my child than a public education, then why spend the extra money?

I hope the MCS Board will admit that there are serious problems within MCS. Its educational program alone requires immediate attention. All of the unhappy parents have a right to express themselves, to be heard, respected and taken seriously.

Hunter & Andrea Davidson
12 student/years at MCS (2 children)
Unable to support its policies or leadership, Andrea resigned from the Montessori Community School of Charlottesville at Pantops Board in October 2005. Technorati Tags: montessori charlottesville

Where Was the Board? An Ex-Board Member Speaks

It was my pleasure to serve on the MCS Board until I resigned in October 2005, unable to support its policies or leadership. In June 2005 the Board began to struggle with its responsibilities as stated in the Bylaws, linked here. The Board's struggle began with the HOS search. The Ad Hoc Search Committee created by the Board identified two main tasks: "1. Filling the immediate needs of the school with two temporary, part-time positions… 'Director of Operations and Marketing' and 'Development Administrator'; 2. Performing a formal Head of School search. This latter process is expected to last at least nine months and we are aiming at having identified a new Head of School for MCS by spring of 2006 and have this person formally hired for the 2006/2007 school year." But ads for the two temporary, part-time positions were never placed. And a formal search was never made for a Head of School.

Without a Head of School in place, the Board found it extremely difficult to fulfill its role as the governing body of the school. The Board lacked vision, determination and strength to lead in a time of change and crisis. As a result, Wendy Fisher, the Director of Education, took on the Board's governing role as well as many of its responsibilities as stated in the Bylaws. The Board struggled with initiative, short term and long-term planning, execution of plans, accountability and evaluating the Director of Education. Eventually, without ever conducting a search, the Board named Wendy Fisher "Interim Head of School" and then, soon after, "Head of School."

The Board allowed the DOE to make sweeping policy changes at MCS. One such change was in the guide structure of the lower and upper elementary classrooms. Assistant guides now float from class to class instead of staying in one class all day. At times this new system leaves the Lead Guide alone with as many as 28 or more students (32 in Upper Elementary at beginning of the year). This change was made without Board approval and without notification to the parents. The Board did not fulfill its duty of being accountable for its educational program. Changes in class layout, guide structure, reenrollment, etc, were made by the DOE without the Board's approval. Since there was no acting HOS, the Board was in aposition to directly monitor actions by the DOE. But when problems arose, the Board showed its unwillingness to step in and support the parents with communication, grace and courtesy. The Board did nothing to prevent the loss of enrollment and incurred tuition refunds.

Another significant change the DOE made was that concerning re-enrollment. The new policy states, "Once a family has made the decision to leave the school before the end of a cycle, we will be unable to offer spaces to younger siblings." This change was also made without Board approval.

The structure of the Board changed as well. In October 2005, another member of the Board resigned along with me, leaving the Board with its minimum required number of members to 10. The list of Board Members is no longer listed in each monthly newsletter. Characteristics of the Board were defined and a Board Member Code of Conduct was established. Board Members were told to refer "questions and concerns of parents or staff to the Administrator." Board Members were told not to "discuss board or committee deliberations outside the meetings."

As a Board Member, I was not free to speak, ask questions or even disagree. I was reprimanded, as others were, and made to feel that my comments were inappropriate and unacceptable. When I resigned from the Board, it should have come as no surprise that I did not receive a letter of recognition from the Board, merely an informal email from the Vice Chairman of the Board.

I care deeply about MCS. This is our 9th year and second child at the school. It would be wonderful for my daughter to stay. I would love to bring my youngest son to MCS in the near future. However, I do not have faith in the Administration or the Board to make good decisions about MCS, the future of the school or the education of my children. The current Head of School and Board leadership lack integrity to follow the proper course. The operation of the Board as a whole has failed to uphold the responsibilities as set forth in the Bylaws and has failed to support the needs of the parents and most importantly the children of the Montessori Community School.

Andrea Davidson
12 student/years at MCS (2 children)
Unable to support its policies or leadership, Andrea resigned from the Montessori Community School of Charlottesville at Pantops Board in October 2005. Technorati Tags: montessori charlottesville

"Authentic" Montessori? That Depends...

Wendy Fisher's actions are defended by some as necessary to foster "authentic" Montessori at the Montessori Community School of Charlottesville at Pantops.

But consider this year's Upper Elementary (UE) class. For this year's UE, Wendy started with an entirely blank slate. She hired a new UE teacher. She wrote the curriculum. She chose to enlarge the class to 32 kids and move it to new classrooms, which she designed and remodeled. She structured the class schedule, eliminated the assistant, and hired the parade of parents doing "specials." Add to this that Wendy is personally in the class two days a week as Patricia's trainer, because Patricia is a student teacher-in training. No doubt this year's UE class is Wendy's baby. So, clearly, this UE class perfectly embodies Wendy's vision of "authentic" Montessori, right?

But that was this year's "authentic Montessori" UE class. For next school year's "authentic Montessori" UE class, which will be far smaller due to families pulling their children out of the class or not reenrolling them due to dissatisfaction with this year's class, the School has announced there will be a second lead teacher in the classroom. Which is exactly what so many parents pleaded with Wendy to do for this year's overcrowded and understaffed class, only to to be rebuffed by her because that would not be "authentic Montessori." Since what she's doing for next year's UE is exactly what parents pleaded with her to do for this year's UE, apparently what qualifies as "authentic Montessori" depends on who proposes it.

While we applaud this change for next year's UE, it simply makes even more obvious the tragedy for the children in this year's UE -- what one UE parent aptly called "an experiment that failed" and what other UE parents are calling a "lost year." Even present and former MCS Board members, the most loyal families at the School, either removed their children from this UE class in mid-year, or did not reenroll them in the UE for next year. Such was the satisfaction with -- and success of -- Wendy's "baby" -- this year's "authentic Montessori" UE class. By Jon Rintels. Technorati Tags: montessori charlottesville

Why Stump Family Pulled Kids Out of MCS in February

From Barret Stump, a teacher and former co-chair of the Montessori Community School of Charlottesville at Pantops Parents Association:

Dear MCS Board Members,

Chuck and I were only mildly surprised when we weren't offered reenrollment contracts with MCS for the 2006-07 school year. We've certainly voiced our opinions this year about the decisions being made and our dissatisfaction with the choices the school is making regarding the education of our children.

What was surprising was the tone of the letter that we received from Wendy, suggesting that we have not worked in partnership with the school, and that "gracious and honest communication strengthens this partnership, and in turn, fosters a more effective learning environment for the children". Also, if we wished to seek reenrollment, we would need to meet with Wendy.

Since enrolling my oldest child at MCS six years ago, Chuck and I have dedicated ourselves to helping MCS be an acclaimed educational setting, not just for our own children, but for others. Together, we worked as a board member, chair of the Parent Association, chair of numerous fundraisers, etc. Never has our commitment to the school been questioned. The entire text of the Stumps' letter is here. Technorati Tags: montessori charlottesville

Why Rintels Family Removed Child from Montessori Community School of Charlottesville

From Jon Rintels, former Board Chair.

To David Cathcart, Chairman of the Board, Montessori Community School of Charlottesville at Pantops, Board Members, and Wendy Fisher, Interim Head of School, MCS

Dear David, Wendy, and Board Members:

Less than 24 hours after the end of the UE Parent Orientation of August 29th, as the true picture of the changes to this year's UE finally started to emerge, Trish and I began expressing our concerns about whether that class structure was the best possible learning environment for UE students and whether it was the best possible class that MCS could provide. At that time, those concerns were, among others, the number of students with one lead teacher, unprecedented at MCS; no assistant, but a rotating patchwork system of adults doing specials who would also somehow serve the assistant function, again unprecedented at MCS; one lead teacher for two non-contiguous classrooms, again unprecedented at MCS; and that the class would be led by a teacher, who while she had 20 years' teaching experience, had only just completed her Montessori training and only just received her Montessori UE certification.

To us, the class changed so dramatically from what history at MCS, as well as the school's communications to us over the spring and summer, had led us to believe we would receive, that it was virtually unrecognizable. Then, as we came to discover, the school's statements about Patricia's experience and qualifications bore no relationship to the truth and much of the other communications were false, inaccurate, or misleading. It is now clear that this class is not the best possible learning environment for UE students and is not the best possible class that MCS could provide. It is also clear that there is nothing preventing MCS from providing a far better learning environment for its UE students. It just chooses not to.

But this letter needs to be about [our daughter], and why we're removing her from the class and MCS, and how her expressed desire "to learn something" (her words) has been so thwarted by this year's UE. The entire letter is here. Technorati Tags: montessori charlottesville

A Policy of Retribution at the Montessori Community School of Charlottesville?

Where did this new policy come from that says if an older child doesn't complete a three-year cycle, then all younger siblings may be banished from the Montessori Community School of Charlottesville at Pantops, regardless of how many years a family has been a faithful, tuition-paying customer? How can such a policy co-exist with the diametrically-opposed principle of individually "following the child"? Since this new policy is a complete reversal of the school's past practices, did the Board vote to approve this change, or was this policy surreptitiously slipped into the Parent Handbook without Board approval? Given the fact that this policy was never part of the enrollment agreement parents signed for the 2005-2006 school year, doesn't it seem improper (if not illegal) for it to be invoked into practice during the 2005-2006 school year? Does it seem that the policy is being arbitrarily and inconsistently applied and is being used as a pretext for retribution (so much so that when the Board found out how parents were being treated when meeting with the Head of School to discuss this policy, the Board apparently had to inform her that it is not acceptable to treat parents with arrogance and insults?) While it is understood that some Montessori Primary schools REQUEST that students stay through kindergarten, is it an AMS-approved practice or a Montessori "best practice" to kick out every family member in a school that goes through the 8th grade, if one child needs to leave before completing a three-year cycle? And what about cases where the school is admittedly at fault for the removal of a child, such as was the case in this year's UE? When the school's at fault, why should younger siblings be punished for that? Don't parents deserve a clear, written explanation from the Board as to why this policy was established; whether the policy is officially endorsed by the Board at this point in time; and, if so, how the policy will be implemented in the future and whether it should co-exist along with an ombudsman or other appeals system for cases where the policy is applied inconsistently or without warrant? Technorati Tags: montessori charlottesville

Posted by Name Withheld, Fears Retribution From Head of School No. 6

Rintels' Letter to Upper El Parents

Attached is the text of an email written by Jon Rintels to Upper El parents at the Montessori Community School of Charlottesville describing the "never before in the history of MCS" conditions in the Upper Elementary (UE) class, and the false and misleading communications sent by the school, and how they violate AMS accreditation standards. Some highlights:

Here are some things I'm concerned about:

• Never before in the history of MCS has there been a class with one lead teacher and over 30 students. This UE class has 32 students and the lead teacher is, as it turns out, an uncertified student teacher still in training.
• Never before in the history of MCS has a class exceeded AMS's published standards that set a maximum class size of 30 UE students. [AMS accreditation standards are here]
• Never before in the history of MCS has there been a class with no assistant, but a patchwork system of adults periodically doing "specials" who are now defined or counted as "assistants," and used in lieu of an assistant. Moreover, we're told there are times that there is only 1 adult in the class with most or all 32 kids. AMS has a published standard maximum of 20 students to each staff person. [AMS accreditation standards are here]
• Never before in the history of MCS has a class been spread across two non-contiguous classrooms where an adult is not regularly present in each classroom. The one prior time MCS had a class that was spread across these two classrooms, there were 33 students, two lead teachers, and two assistants.
• Never before in the history of MCS have such significant changes to a class been made with little or no input from parents of the children in that class.
• Never before in the history of MCS have such significant changes to a classroom been made without fully and accurately communicating them to the parents of the children in that classroom.
• Is this class structure the best way to address last year's UE problems? To now increase class size, eliminate the assistant, move to a class space where the kids can't all be seen and supervised, etc.?
• Why not add a full time assistant to the room? Wendy wrote to UE parents on September 15 that "We have taken a collaborative approach to guiding the students that includes purposeful work with several adults as opposed to less active supervision by one assistantà" But isn't this a false choice? Why shouldn't these adults doing specials be IN ADDITION TO a full-time UE assistant? Why not ALSO have a full time assistant for reasons of safety, supervision, and education?

The entire letter to UE parents is here. Technorati Tags: montessori charlottesville

Top Ten List -- Classroom Structure and Intimidation at MCS

Concerned MCS Parent Name Withheld No. 6, Fears Retribution from Head of School, poses this Top Ten list of questions about the Montessori Community School of Charlottesville at Pantops:

CLASSROOM STRUCTURE -- Five Questions That Deserve Answers

1. What could possibly have triggered the change from the traditional, time-tested, sensible classroom structure of one-lead-guide-plus-one-aide, into a rotating patchwork aide system using "student support specialists" (as the elementary aides are now called)? FULL LIST OF QUESTIONS HERE.

THE ART OF INTIMIDATION -- Five Questions That Deserve Answers

1. Does it seem that an atmosphere of intimidation pervades the Montessori Community School now and that pressure tactics have become the norm? For example, are parents wrong to think that fundraising contributions should be a private choice, and not an act of public coercion as was evidenced this year with an open hand reaching in through car windows at drop-off time, pleading for a donation? FULL LIST OF QUESTIONS HERE. Technorati Tags: montessori charlottesville